No, I'm not talking about your experiences reading your favorite books, but your favorite experiences reading books. That is, the times you most enjoyed the act of reading. I was thinking about this tonight because I've been wondering about the incredibly intense pleasure I feel reading thrillers, even when they're not especially good. What's up with that? I am already forgetting the one I read a couple of days ago (although the one I read yesterday will likely stick with me a while), but I get a delightful little chill thinking about the hours I spent lying on the sofa, in my pajamas, in the middle of the day, zooming through its mass-market pages before a roaring fire. (Can you tell classes haven't started yet?) I also recall the intense pleasure of hiding in our bedroom at our rental house at the Jersey shore one August, reading Black Dahlia Avenger.
Most of the books whose contents have stuck with me have become unmoored form the circumstances in which I read them. Not all--Rhian pointed out that she has rather unpleasant memories of reading Anna Karenina: she was temping at the Teamsters' Union and reading at her desk. I, on the other hand, read Anna K while sipping liquor in our friend's friend's log cabin (insofar as a four-bedroom rustic quasi-mansion with satellite dish and wet bar can be called a cabin) on the Madison River in southern Montana. But I couldn't tell you what it was like reading, say, any Alice Munro story--the intensity of the fiction, I suppose, has overridden the real-world circumstances of my reading it.
I guess a book has to reach a certain threshold of quality before it can generate a memorable reading experience--one has to be into it, after all. But in most circumstances, at least for me, it can't be too good, so good as to make the world around it disappear. Aside from Anna K, I most strongly remember reading books that I read without much effort...the ones that seemed to flow into me. Like, I suppose, sipping liquor in a log mansion.
Showing posts with label reading. Show all posts
Showing posts with label reading. Show all posts
Thursday, January 13, 2011
Thursday, December 30, 2010
Concentration
I was trying to start reading a book the other night (Tom McCarthy's C, BTW, and so far it is excellent, and completely different from Remainder), and found that, over half an hour, I read the first few pages about eight times. It isn't that it wasn't interesting, it was that I couldn't concentrate. At all.
I didn't used to think this when I was younger, but I now believe that concentration is hard. And I am not one of those people who think that the distractions of modern life etc etc blah blah. I think human beings are naturally distractable. And that the act of reading a novel requires skills that have to be acquired in life, and can be temporarily lost.
Think about what a novel is asking us for: to switch off all of our perceptive organs and give ourselves over, entirely, to the consciousness of imaginary people. It is (as I suggested in the comments of the previous post) like sex. And who can blame us for not always being in the mood? Also like sex, it is a rare and transcendent pleasure, and one that gets all tangled up with our sense of ourselves. It's complicated.
Sometimes, when I have something I really really really want to read, like this McCarthy book, or a new Alice Munro story in the New Yorker, I have to wait until the perfect moment to read it, so that I don't blow it--ruin my experience of it with inadequate concentration. As a result, I occasionally forget to read these things entirely, while things I don't give a crap about, I dispatch right away.
And writing? Forget about it. These days, I can only write first thing in the morning. Anything past 9am, my mind has turned to garbage. Maybe someday I'll have to do my reading then, too. Until that time, it's catch as catch can.
I didn't used to think this when I was younger, but I now believe that concentration is hard. And I am not one of those people who think that the distractions of modern life etc etc blah blah. I think human beings are naturally distractable. And that the act of reading a novel requires skills that have to be acquired in life, and can be temporarily lost.
Think about what a novel is asking us for: to switch off all of our perceptive organs and give ourselves over, entirely, to the consciousness of imaginary people. It is (as I suggested in the comments of the previous post) like sex. And who can blame us for not always being in the mood? Also like sex, it is a rare and transcendent pleasure, and one that gets all tangled up with our sense of ourselves. It's complicated.
Sometimes, when I have something I really really really want to read, like this McCarthy book, or a new Alice Munro story in the New Yorker, I have to wait until the perfect moment to read it, so that I don't blow it--ruin my experience of it with inadequate concentration. As a result, I occasionally forget to read these things entirely, while things I don't give a crap about, I dispatch right away.
And writing? Forget about it. These days, I can only write first thing in the morning. Anything past 9am, my mind has turned to garbage. Maybe someday I'll have to do my reading then, too. Until that time, it's catch as catch can.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)