I've been having kind of an amusing exchange with a friend on facebook, a fellow teacher, who presently is grappling with inexperienced writers' mistakes. She has been citing the mistakes, and then I have been firing back with examples of really good fiction that uses the "mistake" to greater ends. For instance, to "it was all a dream" I countered David Foster Wallace's "Oblivion." "Everyone dies in a car accident at the end" reminded me of Charles Baxter's "Saul And Patsy Are Getting Comfortable In Michigan" (although he did bring them back to life in a later story and novel). And when my friend complained that her students don't even know to start a new paragraph for dialogue from a new speaker, I threw down Stephen Dixon's Interstate.
Of course my friend is right: there are things that are almost impossible to do well, and other things that a beginner can wrap his head around more easily, and learn to do skillfully, in the three-and-a-half-month confines of an academic semester. But wow, it's hard to know how to tell them what's right and what's wrong. "Some writers have been able to use this technique effectively," you can say, "but it isn't working in your story." Or, "Traditionally, dialogue is formatted this way. You can format it another way, but you need to know the convention, and understand the consequences of breaking it."
If you ever wonder why creative writing classes often seem to be graded rather generously, this is the reason. Everything is a gray area. Nothing can be judged out of context. There are no things you can't do, and there are no things that always work. There are only...things. An infinite number. And they can be arranged in an infinite number of ways. It's enough to make me think my job might actually be...difficult.
Well--let's go with "complicated."
Showing posts with label rules. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rules. Show all posts
Wednesday, March 2, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)